THE LAW ON ZIP CODES
PLEASE READ!
|
The use of ZIP CODES is voluntary per Domestic Mail Services Regulation
Section 122.32. No discrimination for the NON-USE of the ZIP CODE per Public
Law 91-375, Section 403. NOTICE! The use of fictitious names or addresses
(ALL CAPITAL LETTERS) in a private individual’s name, or a ZIP CODE, against
the individual’s wishes, is a crime under Title 39 U.S.C. Section 3003, Title 18
U.S.C. 1302, 1341, 1342., and is punishable by up to 15 years imprisonment and
$1,000,000.00 fine.
Use of the ZIP Code is voluntary. See Domestic Mail Services Regulations,
Section 122.32. You should also know that the Postal service can not
discriminate against the non-use of the ZIP Code. See "Postal Reorganization
Act", Section 403, (Public Law 91-375). The federal government utilizes the ZIP
code to prove that you reside in a "federal district of the District of Columbia".
This is why the IRS and other government agencies (state and federal) require
a ZIP Code when they assert jurisdiction by sending you a letter. They claim
that this speeds the mail, but this is a sly and subtle TRICK. It is also prima
facie evidence that you are a subject of Congress and a "citizen of the District
of Columbia" who is "resident" in one of the several States.
The receipt of mail with a ZIP code is one of the The receipt of mail with a ZIP
code is one of the requirements for the IRS to have jurisdiction to send you
notices. The government cannot bill a Citizen of Illinois, because he is not
within the purview of the MUNICIPAL LAWS of the District of Columbia. In fact,
the Internal Revenue Service has adopted the ZIP code areas as Internal
Revenue Districts. See the Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53,
Wednesday, March 19, 1986.
You must remember that the Postal Service is a private corporation, a quasi-
governmental agency. It is no longer a full government agency. It is like the
Federal Reserve System, the Internal Revenue Service, and the United States
Marshall Service. They are all outside the restrictions of the Federal
Constitution, as private corporations. They are all powerful in their respective
areas of responsibility to enforce collection for the federal debt. So, if you are
using a ZIP code, you are in effect saying openly and notoriously that you do
not live in the State of Illinois, but, instead are a resident in the Illinois area of
the District of Columbia (a federal district). There are some so-called Patriot
groups that I consider to be patriots for money. They advocate the use of Title
42 suits (which are for federal citizens only), send mail to you with a ZIP Code,
and ask you to do things that place you within the municipal jurisdiction of the
District of Columbia.
Remember these individuals may be agents of the government or, even worse,
are advocating a one-world government by the use of the Social Security
number and the ZIP code.
So you must be aware of the movement towards a one-world government
through annihilation or elimination of State Citizens by use of the so-called 14th
Amendment and its related laws.
It is this writer's opinion, both as a result of study, e.g. of page 11 of the
National Area ZIP Code Directory; of 26 U.S.C. 7621; of Section 4 of the Federal
Register, Volume 51, Number 53, of Wednesday, March 19, 1986, Notices at
pages 9571 through 9573; of Treasury Delegation Order (TDO) 150-01; of the
opinion in United States v. LaSalle National Bank, 437 U.S. 298, 308, 98 S.Ct.2d
2357, 57 L.Ed.2d 221 (1978); of 12 U.S.C. 222; of 31 U.S.C. 103; and as a result
of my actual experience, that a ZIP Code address is presumed to create a
"Federal jurisdiction" or "market venue" or "revenue districts" that override
State boundaries, taking one who uses such modes of address outside of a
State venue and its constitutional protections and into an international,
commercial venue involving admiralty concerns of the "United States", which is
a commercial corporation domiciled in Washington, D.C.
More specifically, looking at the map on page 11 of the National ZIP Code
Directory, e.g. at a local post office, one will see that the first digit of a ZIP
Code defines an area that includes more than one State. The first sentence of
the explanatory paragraph begins:
"A ZIP Code is a numerical code that identifies areas within the United States
and its territories for purposes of ..." [cf. 26 CFR 1.1-1(c)].
Note the singular possessive pronoun "its", not "their", therefore carrying the
implication that it relates to the "United States" as a corporation domiciled in
the District of Columbia (in the singular sense), not in the sense of being the 50
States of the Union (in the plural sense). The map shows all the States of the
Union, but it also shows D.C., Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, making the
explanatory statement literally correct.
Properly construed, ZIP Codes can only be applicable in Federal territories and
enclaves that may be located within the 50 States of the Union, and to the
"United States" and District of Columbia and its territories -- cf. Piqua Bank v.
Knoup, 6 Ohio 342, 404 (1856) and U.S. v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 63 (1936) to the
effect that "in every state there are two governments; the state and the United
States." Therefore, ZIP Code addresses are for the corporate "United States"
and its agents (for example, a customs and duty collector at New York harbor,
when they move out into the States of the Union to perform functions
delegated to the "United States" by the National/Federal Constitution, or the
Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, Bureau of Motor Vehicles, or a U.
S. Congressman).
But, by propaganda, misleading information and seditious syntax, government
has gotten nearly everyone in the 50 States of the Union to use ZIP Codes of
address, and that creates a PRESUMPTION or a PREJUDICIAL ADMISSION that
one is in such a Federal venue, or that one is such a government agent.
In general, it is well settled in law that Income Tax Statutes apply only to
corporations and to their officers, agents, and employees acting in their official
capacities, e.g. from Colonial Pipeline Co. v. Traigle, 421 U.S. 100, 44 L.Ed.2d 1,
95 S.Ct. 1538 (1975): "... However, all 'income tax statutes' apply only to state
created creatures known as corporations no matter whether state, local, or
federal." Since corporations act only through their officers, employees, etc.,
the income tax statutes reach out to them when acting in their official
capacities, but not as individuals. This is the real purpose for Identifying
Numbers -- cf. 26 CFR 301.6109-1(d) & (g) and 26 U.S.C. 6331(a) and 26 CFR
301.6331-1, Part 4.
Use of a ZIP Code address is tantamount to the admission of being a "citizen of
the United States" who does not necessarily have the protections of the first
eight Amendments to the Constitution (in the Bill of Rights) when proceeded
against by Federal or State authority -- Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U.S. 581, 20 S.Ct.
448 (1900), but, "All the provisions of the constitution look to an indestructible
union of indestructible states", Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700; U.S. v. Cathcart, 25
F.Case No. 14,756; In re Charge to Grand Jury, 30 F. Case No. 18,273 (65 C.J.
Section 2) -- not known to be overturned.
# # #
S A M P L E L E T T E R
To Whom It May Concern:
Please kindly correct your records to show that I am located at:
NON-DOMESTIC
c/o ______________ Street
City/Town, State (spell out full name)
zip code exempt (DMM 122.32)
Since the use of ZIP codes is voluntary (see Domestic Mail Service Regulations,
Section 122.32), the U.S. Postal Service cannot discriminate against the non-
use of ZIP codes, pursuant to the Postal Reorganization Act, Section 403
(Public Law 91-375)
The federal government attempts to assert jurisdiction by sending letters with
ZIP codes, when jurisdiction would otherwise be lacking. The receipt and
"acceptance" of mail with ZIP codes is one of the requirements for the Internal
Revenue Service, in particular, to have jurisdiction to send notices. In fact, the
IRS has adopted ZIP code areas as "Internal Revenue Districts". See the
Federal Register, Volume 51, Number 53, for Wednesday, March 19, 1986.
The federal government cannot bill a __________________ State Citizen
because such a Citizen is not within the purview of the District of Columbia, its
territories, possessions or enclaves. As a group, these areas are now uniquely
and collectively identified as "the federal zone", as explained in the book
entitled The Federal Zone: Cracking the Code of Internal Revenue, San Rafael,
Account for Better Citizenship, 1992. Your immediate cooperation in this matter
will be most appreciated.
Signed with explicit reservation of all my rights
and without prejudice to any of my rights,
/s/ John Q. Doe __________________________________________________
John Q. Doe, _______________________ state Citizen
Nonresident Alien with respect to The Federal Zone
(D.C., its territories, possessions and enclaves)


